Tuesday, July 24, 2012

Internet Terrorists: Ignorance Run Amuck

The general consensus among the people who have visciously attacked me is that this is all about getting back at a girl. Keeping in mind, of course, that my orignal list did not include her blog. I had already done a blog about her ethics as a blogger so re-hashing it would have been redundant. However, when she sent her gang of bullies after me, I changed my mind.

Then they say that I am disgruntled over a bad review. Here is the kicker, I haven't had a bad review of my books for over a year. The only bad review I had was the first one, which brought to light about a mistake that I made and I thanked the reviewer for it and as a reward, sent her a copy of my second book.

So, those two theories are shot.

That all aside, my attackers are many. Let's just say about a hundred perhaps. Maybe more. And even after they got what they wanted, me banned from Goodreads, they continue to talk about me on their blogs, websites and the entire internet period. So much so that I now have two websites supporting me, STGR and Goodreads Follies. I have been contacted today by two other websites who want to pick up this story and I will be sending them all the information they need, including the true story of my relationship with the girl who started this all. That will be presented by itself. So I doubt this thing will go away soon. The truth is, I don't want it to go away. Because like one person said in one of my comments, I am the flavor of the week, people will forget about me when they move on to their next victim. My hope is, that there will be no more victims of these internet terrorists. So I am keeping this alive for that purpose. That and the fact that they have now forced a 17 year old girl to close down her blog because they got bored with me and needed someone else to go and harass.

The funny thing is, to show how ignorant these terrorists are, they think she and I are either the same person or that there is some romantic connection. I suppose in their world, the concept of friendship and people helping people doesn't resonate in their reasoning. They just want to take every little thing, every little word and twist it around until they can make something from it that they want it to be. Then they start talking about where this 17 year old lives. Really?

Then they say she and I have known each other for years. The truth is, one of my mods in my group on Goodreads suggested she would be a pretty good mod and that is how she and I started actually talking and becoming friends. But you can't reason with ignorant internet terrorists. Not a single one of them knows me or her. I have never spoken to any of them at anytime that I can recall. Nor has Ira. yet, they seem to know an awful lot of details about my relationship with JH after she turned 18. All the details except for .... well, I am not telling here, you will have to just read it when the story comes out.

Then I am told I am doing this for attention. Okay, let's just think about that for a moment. If I knew somebody was posting a blog about something and I was "personally offended" like these terrorists are because they are bloggers too, and I thought for a moment that the person writing the blog was seeking attention, then why would you give that person the attention they seek? Why play into it? I think the best course of action would be to ignore that person and NOT give them that attention.

Bu there's the thing, all of those reasons above are not any of their reasons. Just their excuses that enables them to terrorize people at will. And for them to know that they have the support and personal backing of Patrick Brown, the manager of Goodreads, to cover for them. But like another comment mentioned, maybe he is just frustrated that his life consists of internet baby-sitting for ten dollars an hour. I don't know. Certainly something to ponder.

Then they also have to talk about my engagments like they know what the hell they are talking about. And they don't. And then they start saying that just because I am bi-polar, that I am some kind of mental patient. That kind of talk just shows their ignorance and how uncompassionate they are towards people who may be suffering from mental illness. But that's bullies for you. They attack at all angles. They don't care about any of that stuff, they just won't be staisfied until they destroy someone. That's their job in life. That is their only purpose. To be internet terrorists. This coming from someone who served in the military. Yes, I am a veteran. My ex manager is retired military. And this is what I get for risking my life for my country? Eh, whatever. I can deal. Of course now I just gave them something more to slosh around. They will attack me about it and say I am lying about being in the military. But if they really have been reading all of my old posts in Goodreads, they will see that part of my life is very well documented and spoken about. But they will twist it around to fit their world. That's bullies for you. That's what internet terrorists do.

Another documented illness or addiction is alcahol. They take pot-shots at me and my drinking. They claim that I am trying to get people to feel sorry for me because I have a drinking problem. Well here is the newsflash, I don't have a drinking problem. I haven't had a drink in almost two months. I do sometimes go on binges, but those last for about a week or two and then I am good. But these people whom I have never spoken to before seem to know me better than I know myself or my friends know me. The fact that they do not know me clearly shows the ignorance of these internet terrorists as they continue to talk all over the net about a person they do not know, a relationship they know nothing about, and a situation where knowledge thereof eludes them.

The only reason they are attacking me is because this is their character. This is their job in life. This is their purpose. This is who they are. Internet Terrorists. They do it because they can, and Patrick Brown gives them that opportunity. They do it because it gets them off in their boring lives. And why are their lives so boring? I don't know. I really can't say. I can only speculate and with that I would guess, maybe it has something to do with the decay of daytime drama TV. Maybe they are upset that "Days Of Our Lives" got cancelled or something. I honstly can't say. But it wouldn't be too difficult to make the connection.













This next shot is of a friend of mine. She was one of my first friends when I got on Goodreads. We had a religious debate of sorts and by the end of it, we were friends. Here, she brings up a good point.



Of course, when someone of logic and reason enters the picture, these terorrists have to sound like they know me more than someone who actually knows me. I find this amusing. But this is how these people are. They have somehow convinced themselves that they know me more than the people whom I have been associating with for over a year. It fascinates me how these lunatics operate inside their warped mind.



So here is a person telling a friend of mine to either stop reading my posts of lies or shut up. None of these people talking bad about me even know me. They never did and they never will. They only know what their friends know and their friend knows only what they think they do. However, the girl who was told this has been a friend of mine for over a year. See the ignorance here?



Here is another example of someone who has never messaged with me, tells a friend of mine of over a year that she knows me better than my friend. This is proof of ignorance in action. The ignorant one is Kaia.



Like I also said earlier, coming after me wasn't enough. Now they start to spread lies about Ira. Here, an ignorant person lies about what Ira said. Ira never said that she knew me for years. Because we haven't even known each other for a year yet. More like about 10 months. And only through my group as she was a mod of it is why we even communicate with each other. She is a wonderful young lady with a passion for poetry who also helps me on my blog because I knew nothing about it going in. She has been a big help to me and oh, I got the first invite to her wedding when she gets married. She's a sweet kid whom these terrorists are trying to manipulate into hating me like they do.




It all led to one thing for poor Ira. She didn't want anything to do with this. It was for her that I took down my list post and others because she thought by doing so, they would leave me alone. But she saw it didn't. She posted a "rant" and these people wanted to make it into something else. They have in essence caused Ira to suspend her blog that she loves so much because these people won't leave her alone, me alone, they just won't stop it. And I only post what they are posting. Like another good comment on one of my posts said, if they stop talking about it, I wouldn't have anything to post. But now I see, because they admitted that they would find someone else after I am done being the flavor of the week, and I don't want anyone else to have to go through this ordeal because for others, this could shake them or break them where as I actually get a big kick out of their ignorance and perhaps stupidity, shall continue to stand and defend and try and keep their attention on me because after all, I am the drama queen. LOL Anyhow, this is what these internet terrorists did to a 17 year old girl and her blogging dreams because they simply can't let her be.



Ira went so far as to reach out to JH to appear on her and my blog as a guest author to ask her friends and these bully internet terrorists to just back down and leave it alone. To basically try and restore order. But JH refused. She said no. So it is obvious to me, this is what she wanted right from the start. And all of Ira's efforts and my efforts to try and calm things down have gone in vain. Our attempts to have the leader of this terrorist group come on and make a plea of peace, has failed. Soon, there will be four websites covering this debacle. I will try to incorporate as many more as I can. And any website who comes to me wanting the story, I shall accomodate. Hey, my book sales have tripled since this whole thing began. I'd be a fool now to want it to go away. LOL

68 comments:

  1. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  2. My response is too long to fit in one post. I will have to break it down into two or three. Consider this Part one.

    I want to start out by saying that I have no affiliation with any of these websites or blogs that are being mentioned and their links posted all over the place. I came across a link while on Twitter Monday and began sifting through all of this garbage. My first reaction was that of humor. I thought it was funny that grown adults would go after one person on the internet like a bunch of school yard thugs. My next reaction was that of sorrow for Mr. Bryant.

    I am normally not one who would care about things such as this. The only reason I feel drawn to it is perhaps that it reminds me of what my daughter went through a year ago on a website that she was a part of. She was being stalked by a boy online. This lasted for about eight months and was resolved when my daughter had captured enough evidence to get that boy blocked from the site for his actions. It was shortly after that when a mob of people began attacking her. I made her leave that website.

    It seems to me that if Mr. Bryant was stalking this girl, then she would have been able to put together the evidence on her own to submit to the proper authorities and Mr. Bryant would have been banned for that. There would not have been any need for all of you people to get involved. I agree with this post that stalking a girl was not why he was banned. The reason was given in a comment made in one of the posts that he was banned for calling out a guy whom Mr. Bryant thought had threatened him.

    I am also confused by this band of people who are attacking Mr. Bryant because they claim he was going to post a list of a few blogs that he claims had broken their promise to him. While I myself find that petty, it is no more petty than you people attacking him for posting the list. First of all, if it was true then he would have every right to post it. Secondly, if it weren’t true, why would you people even care? If these blogs and their owners are of good reputation then Mr. Bryant’s post would have been ridiculed in silence and behind his back. Everybody would have known that it was false and no mob attack would have been necessary. Not to mention, that all of the attacks on Mr. Bryant would have been related to that topic of the list. Instead, there are multiple attacks on Mr. Bryant ranging from his sexual preference to hi mental illness, which if I read correctly, he suffers from bi-polar. There is absolutely no call for anybody, especially adults such as yourselves, to attack another human being for their illnesses, even alcoholism, if that does in fact apply. You people should be ashamed of yourselves.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This is part two:

      All I have read from these posts and the other links that have taken me through a horrifying ride of internet trash has left feeling dizzy. To see grown adults acting this way when we try to teach our children not to act is disgusting in its own right.

      I also have seen posts where people speak about him using a picture of somebody else as his avatar. While I wouldn’t know why a grown man would choose to do that, especially an author, I do know that my daughter used an avatar of a model for her avatar on that website she was a part of. I see no difference here with the exception of Mr. Bryant’s profession and his age. Which from reading all of these posts that I have come across, nobody seems to know exactly how old he is. I am reminded of my sister who goes around telling everyone she is 7 years younger than what she really is. While not advisable for an author to do, I still see no significance of this relatable to why you people are mad at him when I thought the whole point of this was because he posted a list.

      Where am I going with all this? Well, to sum it up, my outsider eyes tells me that Mr. Bryant is indeed the one who is getting ’bullied’ here. He didn’t get banned for stalking. He didn’t get banned for lying about his age. He didn’t get banned for using a fake picture. He didn’t get banned for being a pedophile. He didn’t even get banned for posting a list. He got banned because of his attackers, one of you people, came after him for doing something that wasn’t against Good Reads TOS and made a post that mistaken by Mr. Bryant as a threat and Mr. Bryant may have over-reacted to that. In conclusion, you guys did get him banned for nothing other than your desire to see him leave. I would call that bullying.

      I will be buying your books Mr. Bryant through my Nook. I hope they are as good as they sound. My deepest and heartfelt regrets for your unnecessary predicament. I wish you great success in your writing endeavors. I will pray that these people will leave you alone soon and that God will forgive them for their actions against you.

      - Just an outsider looking in

      Delete
    2. If I could, I would kiss you!

      Delete
    3. Sara I agree with you!

      Delete
    4. Imagine the smile on my face when I read this. That has got to be the post of the year award winner. I had never looked at it like that. And this brings to question, was I set up by Patrick Brown? And if so, why? Maybe because of a post I did on Goodreads here on my blog. Then again, maybe he and JH have a little something going on, on the side? I guess it doesn't really matter. But it certainly doesn't look good for Patrick Brown. I am turning this over to my lawyer to look at. He and I have a scheduled sit-down tomorrow at his office to discuss things. He has already collected a lot of information the past two days and will be collecting more. I hear JH will be living in California for a while, this is good, now my lawyer can get a court order to check her emails to see if she is behind all of this. That being said, I am with Sara, I could just kiss you. LOL

      Delete
    5. Oww, not me? That hurts!:(
      LOL Kidding :P

      Anyway... yeah, I just woke up this morning when I read this post and Anonymous' comments, and thought "Wow, then there's some people with a functioning brain left in this weird world!"

      Delete
    6. Very beautifully put, Anonymous!

      Delete
  3. If this is true that Carroll was banned for his response for what one of his attackers posted, then that would mean Mr. Brown failed to do his job properly and actually gives more merit to the claim that Carroll was set up. Mr. Brown should be fired!

    ReplyDelete
  4. You'll be relieved to know that Carroll wasn't banned for his response then. Mr. Brown's job is safe.

    Mr. Bryant, you should be careful throwing around the word "terrorist" in this climate. People are already touchy, have been getting advice from lawyers and this has gone ridiculously viral. Calling people terrorists isn't someplace you want to take this.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well, if Patrick Brown's job is safe,then no other Indie author's job is.

      There was a comment made yesterday on one of my posts that clearly said the reason I was banned was for my response to Archer after he posted what I took as a threat. (It has been screen-shot captured)

      Internet terrorist is very accurate. If Patrick hadn't allowed the Goodreads Gang to swarm me, none of this would have occured. He should have stepped in ASAP and stopped it.

      Get your advice from lawyers, I have been too. I have an appointment tomorrow to talk to mine.

      I will agree this has gone ridiculously viral. But not of my doing. It was your Goodreads Gang that posted everything all over the net. Not I. So go chew out your gang of bullies, thugs, terrorists, whatever you want to call them. All the evidence in this matter points to a "set-up" to get me off Goodreads and defame my name without any evidence what-so-ever. It has all been screen-shot captured. And Goodreads stood by and let it happen. Patrick Brown didn't even attempt to consult with me about anything. And I had every right to post my blog.

      Oh, I am taking it there. And now I will soon have four websites covering this story. Your people took it this far, now I am taking it the rest of the way. You and your Goodreads Gang are trying to ruin my name. You think I am just going to sit by and let that happen? I get the feeling, in the coming days,weeks and months, you're going find out just who I am and what I am made out of. And you're not going to like it one bit.

      Not ... one ... bit.

      Bring it tough guy.

      Delete
    2. I'd rather be called a terrorist than a pedophile. You go Carz!!!!

      Delete
    3. Can i get an amen? LOL

      It's about time my people showed up to th eparty. LOL The bullies had their day, now we have ours. LOL

      Delete
    4. The cavalry's arrived! xD Lol
      It took long but we're finally here for you ;-)

      Delete
    5. Let's just see if any of these news agencies call back. I sent out a lot of links.

      If you have access to this site, go here and submit the story and whatever links you have. Fill out the form. Thanks. (May only be for America)

      http://www.abc6onyourside.com/sections/station/

      Delete
  5. It seems it's not very clear yet for what Carroll has been banned.
    It would have been nice of Mr Brown if he kindly told Carroll (and all of us) the reasons why he was banning him. Because, apparently, he didn't tell him. Or did he?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And that's very unprofessional of him.
      1. I think that when all the emails soliciting Mr Brown to ban you started, he should have contacted you and informed you and/or at least "warned" you of your "bad behaviour" and that you risked being banned.
      2. He should have also contacted you when he decided it was fair for him to ban you and should have told you clearly the reasons why you were being banned.
      In doing what he did, he was superficial and unprofessional and I think he didn't really do his job well. I don't know much about managing a website, but I've been a member of countless forums, websites, blogs etc, to know they should first warn you that you risk being banned and for what reason. They should first ask you to remove your offensive, or whatever, content and if you don't, then they can ban you.
      For what I learned, he didn't contact Carroll telling him he was having a bad behaviour. It was other people asking him to take down the "offensive" post (if that's really the reason he's been banned). And he made publicly his excuses to Archer for his misunderstanding (again, if this was the reason he's been banned). In the end he did delete that post, he made his excuses to Archer, but he's been banned anyway.

      Delete
    2. Aww! Kisses back at ya, Sugar! ;-P

      Delete
  6. If there is any official from Goodreads, Patrick Brown or higher, posting comments or reading this, if you want to explain to me why I got banned and are willing to answer a few questions I have, please, feel free to do so. You have my email.

    I don't think these Anon comments are Gr officials. And even if they are, they don't count. Show yourself.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Anonymous, you appear to have hit the nail on his head. Off the record, I have 2 of his books, have only read one at the moment, but I have to say, it was amazing.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I did hear from a source that this "alleged" email I sent JH one time could have been the reason, however, that was not a threatening email. I did not say I would any harm to her. It was also a response email to something she sent me prior that was equally "vile" but she never shows that one to anyone. More importantly, it was through email, not GR. It was personal and shouldn't even have any bearing in this matter to begin with.

    They won't correspond with me. They won't leave themselves that exposed. The turht is, they had no right to ban me. I did nothing worse than what those people were doing to me by coming to me and saying what they were saying. Libel, slander, whatever you want to call it. The mod mentality of it all. The fact remains, if nobody liked what I posted, all they had to do was ignore it. Or say their peace once and begone. Or stick to the topic of the post. None of which occured.

    It was a set up. But everything escalated with two comments, that of Autumn and that of Archer. And yes, when Archer explained it to me, I did apologize for my response.

    Frame job.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Interesting how that post sat for three of four days to begin with - with hardly a view and zero comment. Then on friday afternoon .... Boom! 25,000 views in 36 hours and over 1000 comments. Very interesting indeed. I think a plan was being formed during those first few days.

      Delete
    2. If that's really the reason, then it's even more disconcerting. Personal emails (animated in this case) cannot be material for banning members from a web site. It wasn't a violation of the site's rules. And if she ever felt threatened of harm she should have gone to the police. Not to GR's manager.
      The police would have taken care of it and if was the case would have asked GR to ban the "guilty" member for preventing him to communicate with the "victim".
      If that email was the reason why you were banned, then that Mr Brown has been even more unprofessional and unjust than I thought.

      Delete
  9. My 2 cents....Mr. Brown dropped the ball on this one. He had many opportunities to intervene and keep it from getting out of hand but he chose not to.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I have sent out links to this blog and other sites including facebook and twitter and Goodreads to three major TV news outlet in Ohio.

    Viral? I think we can do better than that. I want all my supporters to go to Yahoo search engine and type in my name. Do this ten different times and get it in the Yahoo top search. Even more people will see what is going on.

    ReplyDelete
  11. No offense, dude, but the "lawyers" are going to look at you as a new car or their kids' college educations, and all those news outlets are going to look at you as a nutter.

    You haven't exactly presented yourself in any other light, and the saddest part is you're incapable of stepping back and seeing it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Said the anon hiding behind the anon.

      Delete
    2. Well, given your propensity for threatening to publish people's information, why should you expect anyone to actually want to associate with you?

      Also, GR has a RESPONSIBILITY to ban people who are acting predatory. Legally. They acted, and they're allowed to act, because they are a private company.

      Delete
    3. Proof?

      If you're talking about Autumn, her info is already public.

      How was I acting predatory? I never "went after" anyone. Is that the foundation of predatory? To prey? I wasn't preying on anyone. I just posted a blog.

      Look atthe hundreds that preyed on me. People I didn't even know existed. I was preyed upon and GR allowed it to happen

      Delete
    4. So much so that I now have two websites supporting me, STGR and Goodreads Follies. I have been contacted today by two other websites who want to pick up this story and I will be sending them all the information they need, including the true story of my relationship with the girl who started this all. That will be presented by itself.

      I will be sending them all the information they need

      And what information "do they need"? To do what? I'm sure you'll have a very one-sided story to tell but such statements are threatening. If you had a close relationship with this blogger you likely know her real name, possibly address, phone number etc. Is that what you're implying is the "information they need"?

      The websites that support you have a reputation already for enabling stalking and publishing personal information. If you don't want people to suspect this of you-- DON'T ASSOCIATE WITH THEM. Otherwise you have put yourself in a situation to be suspected of such things.

      To most this would be simple, common, logic, but I know I will be ignored by you. Nevertheless this is more for other readers. And further examples of how you have done nothing but dug your own grave.

      Delete
    5. Information about the truth of my relationship with this girl. No phone numbers, addy's - geesh. It's my time to tell the story. And as for your "one sided" theory, it's only been one sided thus far. The bullies side.

      Now I will be able to get my side out.

      I still don't get how I have "dug my own grave" - all I did was post a blog. You people are so dimented, you don't realize that the grave I am digging is for you. You just can't go on a bully spree and accuse me of being this and that without evidence. You can't just say certain things that can kill a career if you don't have proof to back it up. Autumn is going to pay and pay dearly if I have anything to say about it. And we'll see about GR, PB and JH. Those are my 4 targets at this point. PB let things get out of control. He could have stopped it. GR is his employer, hand in hand, and JH? I know she put this all together only she didn't think it would get so out of control.

      Delete
    6. And I know all your names so my lawyer won't waste too much time finding you.

      Delete
    7. Where are we, in kindergarten?
      It seems to me that you people want to read just what you want to read.
      You just assume he will give those sites personal info about other people, such as even their address and phone number. What for? No one need or care to know where others live or their phone number. I, personally, don't give a fuck.

      It doesn't need to be a genius to understand the meaning of that statement. Carroll meant he would give them all the screenshots, dialogues and details on this damn story and his relationship with that girl.
      Even my dog would understand he didn't mean he would give them personal informations such as where people live. I don't see how it could concern us or help with the matter.

      And, seriously? "I will be sending them all the information they need" is a threat?
      Oh well, then my smartphone should sue me for threatening it to exchange it for another one better. Poor thing.

      Delete
  12. I have noticed that all of a sudden, the bullies disappeared. I bet they are still talking though.

    I don't know what anon up there is talking about, all the evidence shows that I was being slandered/libel, call it what you want. I was the one who was attacked.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Says the dude hiding behind a filter to only provide his side of the story.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ditto.

      I also have collected hundreds of screen shots proving my side of the story.

      Delete
  14. Mr. Bryant, in two screen captures of your posts, there are references to a detective and an attorney. Can you please provide your attorney's information and address?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Not to an Anon, I won't. And only after I get an explanation and some questions answered by the appropriate people. Until then, you'll just have to be patient. Let things unfold in their natural order.

      Delete
  15. To the Anon who sent me that link: It won't open.

    ReplyDelete
  16. They aren't done talking about you: http://www.hippiesbeautyandbooksohmy.com/2012/07/important-site-update-review-policy.html

    http://evie-bookish.blogspot.com/2012/07/important-change-in-review-policy.html?spref=tw

    REPORT THEM!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You need to take these links down. I have had nothing to do with this matter. I haven't harassed you and I do not want a link to my blog posted on this site! Enough it enough! This link goes to Policy Changes and it is ridiculous that you posted it!

      Delete
    2. To Amanda Welling:

      You posted a link on your blog that hot-links to another blog that is talking about me. You now put yourself into it by doing that.

      Delete
    3. Seriously Carz? Amanda posted a link to a blog talking about you? And she doesn't think that is a form of harassment or bullying? From what planet do these people come from? Planet stupid?

      Delete
    4. I think it's in the star system of the "Stupidtarius" galaxy. It circles another planet called "Theiranus" LOL

      Delete
    5. Amanda has sent me another message. I am not going to post it because I do not want her to be able to delete it later. Here is what it says.

      Amanada Welling wrote: "I did not post a link directly to your blog. I referenced Evie's blog as to why I was making changes. If you think this is bullying, you have never been bullied in your life. I have not said one word about you on a personal level. My post is about changes to my review policy. But that is okay, you want to be bullied? I can do that! Just say the word!"

      Forst in my response, to demonstrate how she does not know how to read or understand what it is that she does read, I didn't say Amanda that you posted a link directly to my blog, I said (and I quote) "YOU posted a link on YOUR blog that hot-links "TO ANOTHER BLOG" that is talking about me. You now put yourself into it by doing that."

      If it's your blog policy change then why even reference Evie's blog? What does her blog policies have to do with yours?

      Then you go on to say that if I want you to bully me to just say the word. I wish all of you would stop bullying me like you have ever since last Friday. However, I can't make that choice for you, you will have to just decide that in your own, but WORD! You already are bullying me. However, now I have it that you actually admit that you are or are willing to do so. Thank you for that.

      Have a nice day. :)

      Delete
    6. I referenced Evie because I didn't want to be involved in your whole mess, but I did need to give an explanation as to why I decided to change my policy. My post itself says nothing about you. At this point, you are being vindictive against anyone and everyone. If you are being bullied, look into the mirror and ask yourself if you are part of the blame. Have a nice life!

      Delete
    7. By referencing Evie, you got yourself involved. If you wanted to stay out of it, you wouldn't have linked her story about me that has a screen shot of my posts. YOUR followers now have access to the mess. You got yourself involved. If you didn't want to be involved, all you had to tell your followers was, "My policy has changed. I am no longer accepting book reviews for Indie authors except those I have already done business with. Thank you."

      That is all you needed to say. You have no obligation to detail why. And if you think you do, all yuou had to say was, "Due to recent events involving an Indie author, this is why I am making the change of policy."

      You chose to to expand on it by leaving a link that points me out directly. That is getting involved with it.

      I am not being vindicitve, I am trying to defend myself from all of these insane rumors. And how am I being the bully when all I am doing is posting the stuff that YOU people are pasting about me? You stop posting about me and I will stop posting about you posting about me. Did you understand that?

      But now it may very well be too late.

      I will have a nice life, thank you. And you have one as well.

      Delete
    8. But if you want to call me a pedophile for dating 18 year old girls, then why aren't you calling Hugh Hefner (owner of Playboy Magazine) a pedophile? He dates them at that age to and he is 90 years old.

      Delete
    9. Funny. I checked Bookish's site and the post is no longer there. Did you ask her to delete it?

      Delete
    10. Nope. I tried the truce thing and they did a double take on me. They took theirs down Tusday and so I took mine down, Then the next day, they put it back up, trying to be sneaky. So I put mine back up and it will stay up until the injustice against me is rectified. Did it surprise me that they lied to me again and tried to pull a fast one? Nope. I have come to expect that from them.

      Delete
    11. I was wondering why you put the post back up. I guess that explains it. Interesting.

      Delete
  17. You are a worthless human being Mr Bryant. STOP TELLING LIES!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. All I see are you trolls coming to his blog and lying, harassing or otherwise being idiots. You keep talking about him in Goodreads. You don't get it, just shut up and leave him alone. You people really are terrorists. Your continued commenting of death wishes and such only confirms this.

      Delete
    2. I see Carroll posting his evidence of everybody's comments in GR so, I am speculating that Carroll is speaking the truth. He is now showing proof of everything while you bullies continue to just wing it. I think you "terrorists" are the problem. supportforcarz.com

      Delete
  18. What happened to the death threat, Carz? Did you delete it? Did the poster delete it?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Death Threats? Carz is getting Death threats now? Isn't a terrorist someone who goes around trying to strike terror into people? I think death threats give validity to the title of this post.

      Delete
    2. LOL there were no death threats. Stop telling lies. You all are a bunch of batshit crazy fucknuts. Tell Carroll to stop having correspondence with minors and writing poems about feeling up teenagers in the back of a van.

      Delete
    3. Whatever. LOL

      As for the poem, yes, I remember that, it is called "In The Back Of My Van". I remember the inspiration for it. I was watching the evening news and they ran a story about an attempted abduction. Fortuantely, they caught the guy. But it did inspire a poem.

      Funny how out of over 700 poems, you would focus on that one? LOL Real interesting in fact. O_o

      Delete
  19. I thought you said you were done with all this and took down everything. Nice to see you keep your word.
    People don't read what they want to read. You delete comments to force people to read what YOU want them to read.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I was done with it. But just like when I took Cupcake off the list, you people kept it up. When I took down the posts, you people kept it up. When I said I was walking away, you people kept it up.

      Moral of the story? You people just won't stop until a grown-up (I.E. police, lawyer) tells you to stop.

      So be it.

      Delete
  20. I put it in my spam file so it couldn't be deleted. Police on their way. When the police arrived the other day, I was told this is all civil. Nothing he could do unless death threats started coming in. They started. I have a couple more I didn't publish.

    ReplyDelete
  21. So....you really don't see why people are a little concerned about you, a forty year old man, having relationships with teenage girls who you've tricked into thinking you are someone else, telling one of the aforementioned girls that she should kill herself, listing Miranda Cosgrove and Selena Gomez under your "Hollywood Crushes" panel (seriously, dude, what professional author even has a place like that on his blog?), and apparently, writing a poem about having sex with a teenager in a van?

    I really hope you don't publish this. It'll only make you more suspicious than you already are.

    On the flip side, I'd be more than happy for you to use this as a chance to clear some things up for all of us. My information could be wrong.

    The choice is yours.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I don't see why anyone is concerned. But if you want to be a little concerned, that is your choise. It still doesn't excuse the attacks I have been getting.

      By having realtionships with teenage girls, you make it sound like teenagers under the age of 18. And that is an intention on your part to dostor the facts to make it seem illegal when in fact, 18 and 19 year old girls are NOT illegal.

      Again, I have not seen this private and personal email that she has been passing around. I have already stated that the email she sent me prior was just as equally vile, but she won't show that one, will she?

      The HollyWood Crush is just for fun. If you take it too seriously, then it is your butt-plug that you need surgically removed, not mine. Again, trying to twist everything around to fit your perverted idea's. And as you know, those girls mentioned are 19 years old now or older so, no law being broken. They are adults.

      That poem about the van was inspired by the news. Not everything I write is from my personal thoughts or life history. Some things are written to tell a story or to bring something to the forefront of social conscience. Again, you are attemptong to put your own spin on it to fit your perverted ideas and assumptions. Not to mention that I wrote that poem when I was 19 years old.

      I published it.

      Ihope this does clear a few things up. It is the same thing I have been saying all along. Your information is wrong. Or at least the way you are attempting to portray them.

      Delete
    2. Either way, you are still going to continue to see things in the opposite way that they are to be intended. All of the hate you people have mustered up inside fo you based on the words of one scroned 18 year old and a misleading email (out of thousands) and you have transformed into the very thing that you people claim to hate, a bully.

      Delete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.